[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78EB813416554F1A973EF20AA714ADF8@subhasishg>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:47:18 +0530
From: "Subhasish Ghosh" <subhasish@...tralsolutions.com>
To: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Watkins, Melissa" <m-watkins@...com>,
<sachi@...tralsolutions.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] tty: add pruss SUART driver
Hi Sekhar,
>>> Say, if the driver is loaded as a module.
>>> If I allocate the sram in the platform code, how to I
>>> free it when the driver is unloaded.
>>
>> This is what I said in my last e-mail. What is
>> the issue you see with this approach?
>>
>> | Thanks for the clarification. In this case, the driver
>> | should use platform callbacks to get/put fast fifo
>> | space. In case this callback is not populated by the
>> | platform or returns an error, the driver should fall
>> | back to allocating from DDR.
>>
>
> ok, so what you are suggesting is that I implement some
> callbacks (like .fifo_alloc, .fifo_dealloc) which can allocate
> memory using sram_alloc.
> My doubt is, if already such API's are there (by Russel) or you
> are suggesting to implement them.
I can add the fifo_alloc/dealloc as part of the suart platform_data,
Is that's what you are suggesting. If you may please point me out
to any example. I am just not clear with this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists