[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikDX0G5EWZ7w1Ob_7YBZpA5xDvGQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:06:10 -0400
From: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Add a sysconf syscall
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> You could also add a vsyscall function and have that function pull the
>> values from vvar data. It would be very fast (i.e. almost as fast as
>> mmaping some data) and it would be more portable.
>
> vvar is a global. The variable data in sysconf is per thread
> (and not even per mm)
>
> Even if you ignore the semantic problem of thread versus mm, you would
> need a new writable page per process and update it any time
> the rlimits and other information is updated.
>
> On the other hand my solution is dead simple and already solves
> the problem.
True. I should read the entire list of variables before making
suggestions that won't work. :)
--Andy
>
> -Andi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists