[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.vvlfaobx3l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 23:29:02 +0200
From: "Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@...a86.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"John Stultz" <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, "Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@...il.com>,
"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] checkpatch.pl: Add check for task comm references
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:19:17 +0200, John Stultz wrote:
> Now that accessing current->comm needs to be protected,
> @@ -2868,6 +2868,10 @@ sub process {
> WARN("usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using
> cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc\n" .
> $herecurr);
> }
> +# check for current->comm usage
> + if ($line =~ /\b(?:current|task|tsk|t)\s*->\s*comm\b/) {
Not a checkpatch.pl expert but as far as I'm concerned, that looks
reasonable.
I was sort of worried that t->comm could produce quite a few false
positives
but all its appearances in the kernel (seem to) refer to task.
> + WARN("comm access needs to be protected. Use get_task_comm, or
> printk's \%ptc formatting.\n" . $herecurr);
> + }
> # check for %L{u,d,i} in strings
> my $string;
> while ($line =~ /(?:^|")([X\t]*)(?:"|$)/g) {
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@...gle.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists