[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DD19D1F.3070506@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:54:39 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Xen MMU's requirement to pin pages RO and initial_memory_mapping.
On 05/16/2011 08:41 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> They become pagetable pages when:
>>
>> - they are explicitly pinned by pin_pagetable_pfn
>>
>> - they are hooked into the current pagetable
>
> Ok, so could we use those two calls to trigger the pagetable walk
> and mark them RO as appropiate? Which call sites are those? The
> xen_set_pgd/xen_set_pud/xen_set_pmd ? Presumarily we don't have
> to do that for the PTE's that are already mapped (as
> xen_setup_kernel_pagetable, and xen_map_identity_early do this
> already).
>
>> Like you wrote, considering that the x86_64 version of
>> kernel_physical_mapping_init hooks the pagetable pages into the
>> currently used pagetable, it wouldn't be possible to mark the pagetable
>> pages RO after init_memory_mapping.
>
Doesn't Xen have some kind of compatibility mode which could be used
during setup?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists