linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/kernel/common.c: Disable SMEP by kernel option nosmep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 May 2011 00:01:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/kernel/common.c: Disable SMEP by kernel option
 nosmep

On Mon, 16 May 2011, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> +/*
> + * If SMEP is supported by the processor, SMEP has been enabled in CR4 earlier.
> + * But if kernel option "nosmep" is given, we disable SMEP here.
> + */
> +static __init void config_smep(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> +{
> +	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SMEP) && unlikely(disable_smep)) {

That unlikely() is completely pointless. This is init code and inside
of a if() already. Where is the point ?

> +		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SMEP);
> +		clear_in_cr4(X86_CR4_SMEP);
> +	}
> +}

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/