linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: statistics about nested locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DD23456.6060400@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2011 10:39:50 +0200
From:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: statistics about nested locks

Sorry for my mistake with the email client and thanks for the hint!
May I resend a (I hope) corrected version of this small patch with the revision
made by Yong?

On 05/16/2011 12:35 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 12:01 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> +The graph below shows the relation between the lock functions and the 
>>> various
>>> +hooks therein. 
>>
>> That smells like the patch has whitespace damage..
> 
> Yeah, Documentation/email-clients.txt might help there.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo

Thanks,

	Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/