linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/18] virtio: use avail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ei3zdsq2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Mon, 16 May 2011 16:42:21 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	linux390@...ibm.com, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com>, lguest@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, steved@...ibm.com,
	habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] virtio: use avail_event index

On Sun, 15 May 2011 16:55:41 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:03:26PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 May 2011 23:51:47 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > Use the new avail_event feature to reduce the number
> > > of exits from the guest.
> > 
> > Figures here would be nice :)
> 
> You mean ASCII art in comments?

I mean benchmarks of some kind.

> 
> > > @@ -228,6 +237,12 @@ add_head:
> > >  	 * new available array entries. */
> > >  	virtio_wmb();
> > >  	vq->vring.avail->idx++;
> > > +	/* If the driver never bothers to kick in a very long while,
> > > +	 * avail index might wrap around. If that happens, invalidate
> > > +	 * kicked_avail index we stored. TODO: make sure all drivers
> > > +	 * kick at least once in 2^16 and remove this. */
> > > +	if (unlikely(vq->vring.avail->idx == vq->kicked_avail))
> > > +		vq->kicked_avail_valid = true;
> > 
> > If they don't, they're already buggy.  Simply do:
> >         WARN_ON(vq->vring.avail->idx == vq->kicked_avail);
> 
> Hmm, but does it say that somewhere?

AFAICT it's a corollary of:
1) You have a finite ring of size <= 2^16.
2) You need to kick the other side once you've done some work.

> > > @@ -482,6 +517,8 @@ void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case VIRTIO_RING_F_USED_EVENT_IDX:
> > >  			break;
> > > +		case VIRTIO_RING_F_AVAIL_EVENT_IDX:
> > > +			break;
> > >  		default:
> > >  			/* We don't understand this bit. */
> > >  			clear_bit(i, vdev->features);
> > 
> > Does this belong in a prior patch?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rusty.
> 
> Well if we don't support the feature in the ring we should not
> ack the feature, right?

Ah, you're right.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/