[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110517131417.731cf095.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:14:17 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the wireless tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
net/mac80211/agg-tx.c between commit ec034b208dc8 ("mac80211: fix TX
a-MPDU locking") from the wireless tree and commit 0744371aeba7
("net,rcu: convert call_rcu(kfree_tid_tx) to kfree_rcu()") from the tip
tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
index cd5125f,53defaf..0000000
--- a/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
@@@ -136,22 -136,6 +136,14 @@@ void ieee80211_send_bar(struct ieee8021
ieee80211_tx_skb(sdata, skb);
}
+void ieee80211_assign_tid_tx(struct sta_info *sta, int tid,
+ struct tid_ampdu_tx *tid_tx)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sta->ampdu_mlme.mtx);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&sta->lock);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_tx[tid], tid_tx);
+}
+
- static void kfree_tid_tx(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
- {
- struct tid_ampdu_tx *tid_tx =
- container_of(rcu_head, struct tid_ampdu_tx, rcu_head);
-
- kfree(tid_tx);
- }
-
int ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session(struct sta_info *sta, u16 tid,
enum ieee80211_back_parties initiator,
bool tx)
@@@ -162,19 -146,16 +154,19 @@@
lockdep_assert_held(&sta->ampdu_mlme.mtx);
- if (!tid_tx)
- return -ENOENT;
-
spin_lock_bh(&sta->lock);
+ tid_tx = rcu_dereference_protected_tid_tx(sta, tid);
+ if (!tid_tx) {
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sta->lock);
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
+
if (test_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_WANT_START, &tid_tx->state)) {
/* not even started yet! */
- rcu_assign_pointer(sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_tx[tid], NULL);
+ ieee80211_assign_tid_tx(sta, tid, NULL);
spin_unlock_bh(&sta->lock);
- call_rcu(&tid_tx->rcu_head, kfree_tid_tx);
+ kfree_rcu(tid_tx, rcu_head);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists