linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ftrace: recordmcount: avoid STT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1305648629.5456.744.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2011 12:10:29 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: recordmcount: avoid STT_FUNC symbols as base
 on ARM

On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 22:53 +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> While find_secsym_ndx often finds the unamed local STT_SECTION, if a
> section has only one function in it, the ARM toolchain generates the
> STT_FUNC symbol before the STT_SECTION, and recordmcount finds this
> instead.
> 
> This is problematic on ARM because in ARM ELFs, "if a [STT_FUNC] symbol
> addresses a Thumb instruction, its value is the address of the
> instruction with bit zero set (in a relocatable object, the section
> offset with bit zero set)".  This leads to incorrect mcount addresses
> being recorded.
> 
> Fix this by not using STT_FUNC symbols as the base on ARM.

Hi Russell,

Can you give me an Acked-by on this patch?

Thanks,

-- Steve

> 
> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
> ---
>  scripts/recordmcount.h |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/recordmcount.h b/scripts/recordmcount.h
> index baf187b..0e2944a 100644
> --- a/scripts/recordmcount.h
> +++ b/scripts/recordmcount.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  #undef ELF_R_INFO
>  #undef Elf_r_info
>  #undef ELF_ST_BIND
> +#undef ELF_ST_TYPE
>  #undef fn_ELF_R_SYM
>  #undef fn_ELF_R_INFO
>  #undef uint_t
> @@ -68,6 +69,7 @@
>  # define ELF_R_INFO		ELF64_R_INFO
>  # define Elf_r_info		Elf64_r_info
>  # define ELF_ST_BIND		ELF64_ST_BIND
> +# define ELF_ST_TYPE		ELF64_ST_TYPE
>  # define fn_ELF_R_SYM		fn_ELF64_R_SYM
>  # define fn_ELF_R_INFO		fn_ELF64_R_INFO
>  # define uint_t			uint64_t
> @@ -96,6 +98,7 @@
>  # define ELF_R_INFO		ELF32_R_INFO
>  # define Elf_r_info		Elf32_r_info
>  # define ELF_ST_BIND		ELF32_ST_BIND
> +# define ELF_ST_TYPE		ELF32_ST_TYPE
>  # define fn_ELF_R_SYM		fn_ELF32_R_SYM
>  # define fn_ELF_R_INFO		fn_ELF32_R_INFO
>  # define uint_t			uint32_t
> @@ -333,6 +336,11 @@ static unsigned find_secsym_ndx(unsigned const txtndx,
>  		if (txtndx == w2(symp->st_shndx)
>  			/* avoid STB_WEAK */
>  		    && (STB_LOCAL == st_bind || STB_GLOBAL == st_bind)) {
> +			/* function symbols on ARM have quirks, avoid them */
> +			if (w2(ehdr->e_machine) == EM_ARM
> +			    && ELF_ST_TYPE(symp->st_info) == STT_FUNC)
> +				continue;
> +
>  			*recvalp = _w(symp->st_value);
>  			return symp - sym0;
>  		}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/