[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110517163847.GF24805@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:38:47 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, NMI, Treat unknown NMI as hardware error
> Can we agree on this, that if an OEM implemented HEST properly such that a
> hardware error happens it will generate a GHES record. The subsequent NMI
Apparently there are some (rare) corner cases where it's hard/impossible
to do. So in those cases you will see an NMI without record.
In the "normal" error case you will a GHES record on NMI.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists