[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110517.140004.2294213911709293397.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:00:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Cc: segoon@...nwall.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ping: fix build failure
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 08:41:25 -0700
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 14:16:56 +0400 Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 15:38 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:35:34 -0700
>> >
>> > > On Mon, 16 May 2011 15:10:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > > when CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL is not enabled:
>> > >
>> > > ping.c:(.text+0x52af3): undefined reference to `inet_get_ping_group_range_net'
>> >
>> > Vasiliy, please fix this.
>>
>> I wonder whether there is any way to test such unusual configurations?
>> Only randconfig or are there any (partly-)automated tools for it?
>>
>>
>> [PATCH] net: ping: fix build failure
>>
>> If CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL=n the building process fails:
>>
>> ping.c:(.text+0x52af3): undefined reference to `inet_get_ping_group_range_net'
>>
>> Moved inet_get_ping_group_range_net() to ping.c.
>>
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists