linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] acpi-cpufreq: Add support for modern AMD CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110517181733.GA26018@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2011 19:17:33 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davej@...hat.com" <davej@...hat.com>,
	"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] acpi-cpufreq: Add support for modern AMD CPUs

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 08:13:53PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> Right, but I don't think that would be different on Intel and
> static_cpu_has is faster with the alternatives mechanism anyway.

>From a neatness perspective it might be reasonable to add it like this 
and then just fix both up in one go, but the same argument applies to 
fixing the intel case first and then applying this patchset. So I'm 
happy enough changing that.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/