[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110517185133.GB9105@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:51:33 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Shreshtha Kumar SAHU <shreshthakumar.sahu@...ricsson.com>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] amba pl011: workaround for uart registers lockup
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:23:56AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:50:17AM +0530, Shreshtha Kumar SAHU wrote:
> > From: Shreshtha Kumar Sahu <shreshthakumar.sahu@...ricsson.com>
> >
> > This workaround aims to break the deadlock situation
> > which raises during continuous transfer of data for long
> > duration over uart with hardware flow control. It is
> > observed that CTS interrupt cannot be cleared in uart
> > interrupt register (ICR). Hence further transfer over
> > uart gets blocked.
> >
> > It is seen that during such deadlock condition ICR
> > don't get cleared even on multiple write. This leads
> > pass_counter to decrease and finally reach zero. This
> > can be taken as trigger point to run this UART_BT_WA.
> >
> > Workaround backups the register configuration, does soft
> > reset of UART using BIT-0 of PRCC_K_SOFTRST_SET/CLEAR
> > registers and restores the registers.
> >
> > This patch also provides support for uart init and exit
> > function calls if present.
>
> Why? You don't use these callbacks in this driver, so why add them?
Ok, I see them in the 2/2 patch now, thanks.
Do you still want me to take this patch through the serial tree, or will
both be going through some ARM tree?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists