[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DD2C947.9050501@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:15:19 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus tree
On 05/17/2011 04:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:05:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/xen/Kconfig, drivers/xen/gntdev.c and include/xen/gntdev.h
>> between various commits Linus' tree and various commits from the xen tree.
>>
>> As previously discussed, I have dropped the xen tree for today (as it
>> contains an older version of the changes that were merged into Linus'
>> tree).
> Just wondering if the xen tree is ever going to make a reappearance in
> linux-next?
Konrad's tree has the bulk of the xen work in it at the moment. I'm
doing to start on a few bits and pieces, but I've not decided if I'll
put them into linux-next myself or just push them via Konrad.
So, maybe, but maybe not.
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists