[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=-Ak5vhCFxgc2rt2rft0PE9XJiTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:40:11 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: make disk_block_events()
properly wait for work cancellation
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Spinlock inside mutex seemed a bit strange but yeah that probably is
> the simpliest way.
Do you really even need the spinlock at all?
Just make the semaphore protect the count - and you're done.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists