[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110517010809.GC13466@game.jcrosoft.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 03:08:09 +0200
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kconfig: autogenerated config_is_xxx macro
On 22:33 Mon 16 May , Michal Marek wrote:
> On 16.5.2011 22:24, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
> >> I figure that this feature is not wanted outside of the kernel build,
> >> though. So what about an option to 'conf' that controls whether these
> >> macros will be generated?
> >>
> > kconfig internal behaviors are mostly controlled by environment
> > variable, which has the advantage to be front-end agnostic, that might
> > be better.
>
> Note that the header file is written by scripts/kconfig/conf
> --silentoldconfig, so different front-ends are not an issue. But an
> environment variable works fine as well.
I want it for ARM, AVR32 and SH too at least so make it optionnal is wished
As they do not affect any code
# git grep config_is_
0 result
Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists