[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DD221BE.3040406@fusionio.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:20:30 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
CC: "Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Perfromance drop on SCSI hard disk
On 2011-05-17 08:09, Alex,Shi wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:37 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
>>>> what I mean is current sdev (other devices too) can still be added into
>>>> starved list, so only does async execute for current q isn't enough,
>>>> we'd better put whole __scsi_run_queue into workqueue. something like
>>>> below on top of yours, untested. Not sure if there are other recursive
>>>> cases.
>>> verified the regression can be fully fixed by your patch (with my
>>> suggested fix to avoid race). Can we put a formal patch upstream?
>>
>> Yes, we tested Jens patch alone and plus Shaohua's patch too. Both of
>> them recovered SAS disk performance too. Now I am testing them on SSD
>> disk with kbuild and fio cases, In theory, they will both work.
>>
>
> As expected, both patches has no effect on SSD disks in JBD.
I will queue up the combined patch, it looks fine from here as well.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists