[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110518064552.GA31801@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 23:45:52 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Mohan Pallaka <mpallaka@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux@....linux.org.uk, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, rmk@...-67.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add stubs for pwm operations
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:48:45AM +0530, Mohan Pallaka wrote:
> Chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes
> would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't
> have support for pwm, even though the chip is programmed
> to work in non-pwm mode. Add stubs for pwm functions to
> avoid compilation errors in these scenarios.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Pallaka <mpallaka@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> include/linux/pwm.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
> index 7c77575..f0bc51f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>
> struct pwm_device;
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM)
Shouldn't it be CONFIG_HAVE_PWM?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists