[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110518000527.bcced636.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 00:05:27 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] v6 Improve task->comm locking situation
On Wed, 18 May 2011 08:25:54 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> " Hey, this looks a bit racy and 'top' very rarely, on rare workloads that
> play with ->comm[], might display a weird reading task name for a second,
> amongst the many other temporarily nonsensical statistical things it
> already prints every now and then. "
Well we should at least make sure that `top' won't run off the end of
comm[] and go oops. I think that's guaranteed by the fact(s) that
init_tasks's comm[15] is zero and is always copied-by-value across
fork and can never be overwritten in any task_struct.
But I didn't check that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists