[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110518144429.GC2011@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:44:29 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: NULL pointer deref in tty port / uart
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:36:36PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > have the same issue.. looks like we should not NULL the port->tty
> > if there's blocked open, but not sure what's exactly the logic
> > behind "port's block_open and count" ..
>
> A pending open is not a user of the tty as far as the rest of the stack
> is concerned. I also don't see why clearing port->tty is causing this
> crash because nothing on that path should ever be going via port->tty and
> it isn't safe to do so.
>
> > attached patch fixes it for me
>
> But still breaks on hangup where we can't do that.
>
> Where is port->tty getting misused to cause the crash, that is the bit
> I'm missing somewhere.
I think it's the
uart_update_termios in uart_dtr_rts (drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c)
called path:
tty_port_block_til_ready
tty_port_raise_dtr_rts
uart_dtr_rts
uart_update_termios
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists