[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimQXU0u5gtRzXsnsB=sCF-bvpY+Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:02:51 +0200
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rmda <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Vu Pham <vu@...lanox.com>, David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ib_srpt: initial .40-rc1 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt merge
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:59:36PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
>> As far as I know InfiniBand HCAs have either one or two ports. If
>> there are two ports present, at most one is active at any time.
>
> This is not true, many installations run dual rail IB with a desire
> for both ports to be active and handling traffic at once. Not sure how
> this translates to SRPT, but a good goal would be for a SRPT target to
> be available on both HCA ports and support APM between them, at the
> discretion of the client.
Thanks for the feedback. I'm still wondering though about the
usefulness of disabling / enabling SRPT per HCA port. For the use
cases I know about SRP communication over all target ports will be
enabled as soon as target configuration has finished and more
fine-grained access configuration will occur by allowing/disallowing
certain initiators to log in.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists