lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110518182605.GC25881@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2011 20:26:05 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephan Barwolf <stephan.baerwolf@...ilmenau.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched: increase SCHED_LOAD_SCALE resolution


* Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com> wrote:

>  /*
> - * Increase resolution of nice-level calculations:
> + * Increase resolution of nice-level calculations for 64-bit architectures.
>   */
> -#define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT	10
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG > 32
> +#define SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION	10
> +#define scale_load(w)		(w << SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION)
> +#define scale_load_down(w)	(w >> SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION)
> +#else
> +#define SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION	0
> +#define scale_load(w)		w
> +#define scale_load_down(w)	w
> +#endif

Please also be a bit more verbose in the comment above why we treat 64-bit 
architectures differently - it's not obvious.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ