linux-kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1305744925-8162-1-git-send-email-abogani@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2011 20:55:25 +0200
From:	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Anders Kaseorg <andersk@...lice.com>,
	Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...glemail.com>,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>
Subject: 

Dear Mr. Bird, Dear Mr. Kroah-Hartman,

Sorry for my very bad English.

2011/5/18 Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>:
[...]
> Alessio - do you have any timings you can share for the speedup?

You can find a little benchmark using ftrace at end of this email:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/5/341

> On 05/17/2011 04:22 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:56:03PM +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
>>> This work was supported by a hardware donation from the CE Linux Forum.
[...]
>> Please explain why you make a change, not just who sponsored the change,
>> that's not very interesting to developers.

You are right. I apologize.

This patch is a missing piece (not essential it is only a further little
optimization) of this little patchset:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/16/48

Unfortunately I forgot to include this patch in the series (my first error)
then I avoided explaining the changes because I had thought that those were
already enough explained in the cover-letter of the patchset (my second error).

Sorry for my mistakes.

Is this better?

Subject: [PATCH] module: Use binary search in lookup_symbol()

The function is_exported() with its helper function lookup_symbol() are used to
verify if a provided symbol is effectively exported by the kernel or by the
modules. Now that both have their symbols sorted we can replace a linear search
with a binary search which provide a considerably speed-up.

This work was supported by a hardware donation from the CE Linux Forum.

Signed-off-by: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/module.c |    7 ++-----
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 1e2b657..795bdc7 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -2055,11 +2055,8 @@ static const struct kernel_symbol *lookup_symbol(const char *name,
 	const struct kernel_symbol *start,
 	const struct kernel_symbol *stop)
 {
-	const struct kernel_symbol *ks = start;
-	for (; ks < stop; ks++)
-		if (strcmp(ks->name, name) == 0)
-			return ks;
-	return NULL;
+	return bsearch(name, start, stop - start,
+			sizeof(struct kernel_symbol), cmp_name);
 }
 
 static int is_exported(const char *name, unsigned long value,
--

Thank you very much!

Ciao,
Alessio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/