[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110518202646.GA14141@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:26:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephan Barwolf <stephan.baerwolf@...ilmenau.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched: increase SCHED_LOAD_SCALE resolution
* Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com> wrote:
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG > 32
> +# define SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION 10
> +# define scale_load(w) (w << SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION)
> +# define scale_load_down(w) (w >> SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION)
> +#else
> +# define SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION 0
> +# define scale_load(w) (w)
> +# define scale_load_down(w) (w)
> +#endif
We want (w) in the other definitions as well, to protect potential operators
with lower precedence than <<. (Roughly half of the C operators are such so
it's a real issue, should anyone use these macros with operators.)
> +#define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT (10 + (SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION))
that () is not needed actually, if you look at the definition of
SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION.
So you could move the superfluous () from here up to the two definitions above
and thus no parentheses would be hurt during the making of this patch.
> + if (BITS_PER_LONG > 32 && unlikely(w >= WMULT_CONST))
> lw->inv_weight = 1;
> + else if (unlikely(!w))
> + lw->inv_weight = WMULT_CONST;
> else
> + lw->inv_weight = WMULT_CONST / w;
Ok, i just noticed that you made use of BITS_PER_LONG here too.
It's better to put that into a helper define, something like
SCHED_LOAD_HIGHRES, which could thus be used like this:
if (SCHED_LOAD_HIGHRES && unlikely(w >= WMULT_CONST))
then, should anyone want to tweak the condition for SCHED_LOAD_HIGHRES, it
could be done in a single place. It would also self-document.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists