[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <493994B35A117E4F832F97C4719C4C04011505C394@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 19:57:17 -0700
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, head_32/64.S: Enable SMEP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@...or.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 4:13 PM
> To: Yu, Fenghua
> Cc: Matthew Garrett; Ingo Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; Mallick, Asit K;
> Linus Torvalds; Avi Kivity; Arjan van de Ven; Andrew Morton; Andi
> Kleen; linux-kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, head_32/64.S: Enable SMEP
>
> On 05/17/2011 04:08 PM, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> >>
> >> Are EFI runtime service pages currently set up appropriately?
> >
> > They are not set up yet. efi init is called after this.
> >
> > But at this time there is no user space code yet. So there is no SMEP
> violation chance until later when any user space page table is setup.
> >
>
> Are EFI runtime pages set up with U=0? I would argue it is a bug if
> they aren't, but we want to make sure that there isn't such a bug.
>
> -hpa
The runtime services are ioremapped. So they should be U=0.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists