[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305678435.26849.0.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:27:15 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: recordmcount: avoid STT_FUNC symbols as base
on ARM
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:50 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:10:29PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 22:53 +0530, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > > While find_secsym_ndx often finds the unamed local STT_SECTION, if a
> > > section has only one function in it, the ARM toolchain generates the
> > > STT_FUNC symbol before the STT_SECTION, and recordmcount finds this
> > > instead.
> > >
> > > This is problematic on ARM because in ARM ELFs, "if a [STT_FUNC] symbol
> > > addresses a Thumb instruction, its value is the address of the
> > > instruction with bit zero set (in a relocatable object, the section
> > > offset with bit zero set)". This leads to incorrect mcount addresses
> > > being recorded.
> > >
> > > Fix this by not using STT_FUNC symbols as the base on ARM.
> >
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > Can you give me an Acked-by on this patch?
>
> It would be better for someone who knows the ELF format for ARM and
> its weirdnesses to ack this patch. I'm afraid my ARM ELF format
> knowledge was been superseded when EABI came along and introduced
> all sorts of new stuff.
OK, in that case, I'll just apply the patch.
Thanks!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists