linux-kernel - Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <369C774C-DF3B-4D8E-BABF-B1C9727AE96E@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Thu, 19 May 2011 00:32:48 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame


On May 18, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> 
>> (I get the feeling that I am the only one testing recent kernels with
>> the mpc85xx.)
>> 
>> Anyhow, I see that this commit was one of a series. For my own use,
>> can I simply revert this one commit independently?
> 
> For your own use sure :-) But I'd still like to get to the bottom of
> this !
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.

Tested the 'merge' branch and it appears to fix the issues with secondary cores coming up.

- k--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/