[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305791036.7481.52.camel@pasglop>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:43:56 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@...t.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cbe-oss-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] powerpc: override dma_get_required_mask by
platform hook and ops
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:25 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> From: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
>
> The hook dma_get_required_mask is supposed to return the mask required
> by the platform to operate efficently. The generic version of
> dma_get_required_mask in driver/base/platform.c returns a mask based
> only on max_pfn. However, this is likely too big for iommu systems
> and could be too small for platforms that require a dma offset or have
> a secondary window at a high offset.
The result of those 3 patches doesn't build on top of my current tree,
the generic dma_ops lacks the dma_get_required_mask hook. I'll have a
look again after the merge window.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists