[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1305794847-3291-20-git-send-email-swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:47:14 +0100
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 19/32] GFS2: Don't use a try lock when promoting to a higher mode
Previously we marked all locks being promoted to a higher mode
with the try flag to avoid any potential deadlocks issues. The
DLM is able to detect these and report them in way that GFS2 can
deal with them correctly. So we can just request the required mode
and wait for a response without needing to perform this check.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index eed4b68..ee2178d 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -543,11 +543,6 @@ __acquires(&gl->gl_spin)
clear_bit(GLF_INVALIDATE_IN_PROGRESS, &gl->gl_flags);
gfs2_glock_hold(gl);
- if (target != LM_ST_UNLOCKED && (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_SHARED ||
- gl->gl_state == LM_ST_DEFERRED) &&
- !(lck_flags & (LM_FLAG_TRY | LM_FLAG_TRY_1CB)))
- lck_flags |= LM_FLAG_TRY_1CB;
-
if (sdp->sd_lockstruct.ls_ops->lm_lock) {
/* lock_dlm */
ret = sdp->sd_lockstruct.ls_ops->lm_lock(gl, target, lck_flags);
--
1.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists