[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DD53FDD.7070503@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:05:49 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: <kumar.gala@...escale.com>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<greg@...ah.com>, <akpm@...nel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-console@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] tty/powerpc: introduce the ePAPR embedded hypervisor
byte channel driver
Alan Cox wrote:
>> > + /* Pass the received data to the tty layer. Note that this
>> > + * function calls tty_buffer_request_room(), so I'm not sure if
>> > + * we should have also called tty_buffer_request_room().
>> > + */
>> > + ret = tty_insert_flip_string(ttys, buffer, len);
> You only need to request_room in advance if you can't handle the case
> where the insert_flip_string returns less than you stuffed down it.
If tty_insert_flip_string() returns less than I stuffed down it, the characters
it didn't accept will be dropped. That's because once I receive them, I have
nowhere else to put them. I suppose I could implement a receive FIFO, but that
seems overkill. If calling tty_buffer_request_room() ensures that
tty_insert_flip_string() always accepts all the characters, I would rather do that.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists