[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110519164021.GN627@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:40:21 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@...hat.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, indan@....nu, bdonlan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] ptrace: make group stop state visible via
PTRACE_GETSIGINFO
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:27:41PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/16, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > @@ -585,6 +587,23 @@ static int ptrace_getsiginfo(struct task_struct *child, siginfo_t *info)
> >
> > error = 0;
> > *info = *child->last_siginfo;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If reporting ptrace trap for a seized tracee, enable reporting
> > + * of info->si_pt_flags.
> > + */
> > + if ((child->ptrace & PT_SEIZED) &&
> > + (info->si_code & __SI_MASK) == __SI_TRAP) {
> > + /*
> > + * Report whether group stop is in effect w/ SI_STOPPED and
> > + * if so which signal caused it.
> > + */
> > + if (sig->group_stop_count || sig->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED) {
>
> Cosmetic nit, you could declare "struct signal_struct *sig" here, under
> if (PT_SEIZED && __SI_TRAP).
Yeap, sure. Will update.
> I must admit, personally I still dislike this new PTRACE_GETSIGINFO API...
> But I can't suggest anything better, so I am not going to argue.
It's not the prettiest, I agree, but it is more or less in line with
the rest of the interface, so...
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists