[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305834169.32080.81.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:42:49 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/6 net-next] netdevice.h: Add zero-copy flag in
netdevice
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 10:00 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:51 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Yes, I agree. I think for tcpdump, we really need to copy the
> > data
> > > > anyway, to avoid guest changing it in between. So we do that
> and
> > then
> > > > use the copy everywhere, release the old one. Hmm?
> > >
> > > Yes. Old one use zerocopy, new one use copy data.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Shirley
> >
> > No, that's wrong, as they might become different with a
> > malicious guest. As long as we copied already, lets realease
> > the data and have everyone use the copy.
>
> Ok, I will patch pskb_expand_head to test it out.
I am patching skb_copy, skb_clone, pskb_copy, pskb_expand_head to
convert a zero-copy skb to a copy skb to avoid this kind of issue.
This overhead won't impact macvtap/vhost TX zero-copy normally.
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists