linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tcp: Implement a two-level initial RTO as per draft RFC 2988bis-02.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTinzTN=w9213+pCvBWuT5af7L7bKfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 May 2011 13:30:15 -0700
From:	tsuna <tsunanet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	alexander.zimmermann@...sys.rwth-aachen.de, hagen@...u.net,
	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Implement a two-level initial RTO as per draft RFC 2988bis-02.

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:27 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> So using SCTP as an example of "see we do this already over here" is a
> non-starter.  Don't do it.

Fair enough.  I hope that the "there's no one-size-fits-all solution"
argument has more weight than "hey SCTP does it".  :)

-- 
Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
Software Engineer @ www.StumbleUpon.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/