[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <sig.2120eee186.4DD597A2.4040306@radicalsystems.co.za>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:20:18 +0200
From: Jan Zwiegers <jan@...icalsystems.co.za>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI BAR1 Unassigned
On 2011-05-20 12:13 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Jan Zwiegers<jan@...icalsystems.co.za> wrote:
>> On 2011-05-19 08:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Jan Zwiegers<jan@...icalsystems.co.za>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have the problem below where my PCI card's second BAR does not get
>>>> assigned.
>>>> What can be the cause of this problem?
>>>> The last kernel I tested on which worked OK was 2.6.27.
>>>> My current problematic kernel 2.6.35.
>>>>
>>>> 05:01.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Eagle Technology PCI-703 Analog I/O Card
>>>> (rev 5c)
>>>> Flags: bus master, slow devsel, latency 32, IRQ 22
>>>> Memory at 93b00000 (type 3, prefetchable) [size=2K]
>>>> Memory at<unassigned> (type 3, prefetchable)
>>>> Capabilities: [80] #00 [0600]
>>>> Kernel modules: pci703drv
>>>
>>> Could be resource exhaustion or, more likely, we ran out because we
>>> now assign resource to things that don't need them, leaving none for
>>> things that *do* need them. This sounds like a regression, so we
>>> should open a bugzilla for it and attach dmesg logs from 2.6.27 and
>>> 2.6.35.
>>>
>>> Does this problem keep the driver from working? (Sometimes drivers
>>> don't actually use all the BARs a device supports.)
>>
>> I'm the maintainer of the driver and was involved in the development of the
>> board as well in 2003. The board uses two BARS and the second BAR is the
>> most important. The board worked fine since the 2.4 days and only recently
>> became problematic. I suspect it works on even later kernels than 27, maybe
>> 2.6.32.
>>
>> My knowledge is too little to actually determine if the problem is because
>> the FPGA based PCI interface is not within spec or something that changed in
>> the kernel, because of the post .30 releases becoming more strict to PCI
>> specification, i.e. BIOS / Kernel interaction.
>
> Well, let's at least look at the working and broken dmesg logs. My
> money is on kernel breakage. If it used to work, it should still
> work.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
What do you need from me? I have at least 3 machines on which it used to
work and is now running a later kernel. I can post dmesg from both .27
and .35. Will do tomorrow when I'm back at the office.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists