[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305869904.7481.145.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:38:24 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c between commit 23d72bfd8f9f ("powerpc:
> Consolidate ipi message mux and demux") from the powerpc tree and commit
> 184748cc50b2 ("sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to
> smp_send_reschedule()") from the tip tree.
>
> The former superceded part of the latter's changes, so I just used the
> former for that.
I've done the merge and resolved the conflict properly (it's actually
non trivial due to some other changes) in the powerpc tree, I'll send a
pull request to Linus later today.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists