linux-kernel - [PATCH 29/44] x86: Better comments for get_bios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 May 2011 17:10:47 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 29/44] x86: Better comments for get_bios_ebda()

From: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>

Make the comments a bit clearer for get_bios_ebda so that it actually
tells us what it is returning.

Signed-off-by: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/bios_ebda.h |    7 +++++--
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bios_ebda.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bios_ebda.h
index 5174cf0..aa6a317 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bios_ebda.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bios_ebda.h
@@ -4,11 +4,14 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 
 /*
- * there is a real-mode segmented pointer pointing to the
- * 4K EBDA area at 0x40E.
+ * Returns physical address of EBDA.  Returns 0 if there is no EBDA.
  */
 static inline unsigned int get_bios_ebda(void)
 {
+	/*
+	 * There is a real-mode segmented pointer pointing to the
+	 * 4K EBDA area at 0x40E.
+	 */
 	unsigned int address = *(unsigned short *)phys_to_virt(0x40E);
 	address <<= 4;
 	return address;	/* 0 means none */
-- 
1.7.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/