[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110520152118.GA10699@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 19:21:18 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
dilinger@...ued.net, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] olpc_battery: bind to device tree
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:34:30PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> [cc'ing devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org. Please cc this list for
> any dt-related patches]
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org> wrote:
> > Move from being statically probed by platform presence to binding to
> > the battery node of the device tree.
> >
> > This is cleaner and allows suspend/resume (wakeup) support to be added
> > in a later patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
>
> Hi Daniel, comments below.
Daniel,
I just wondering what happened with this patch?..
Thanks!
--
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists