[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1105201407480.14430@xanadu.home>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:09:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/19] ARM: LPAE: Add support for
cpu_v7_do_(suspend|resume)
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 08:27 +0100, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Do we really need all this ifdef else throughout this series?
> >
> > I think we already have things in place to do this dynamically
> > like we already do for thumb, smp_on_up, v6 vs v7 and so on.
>
> By dynamically, do you mean at run-time? We won't be able to compile
> both classic and LPAE in the same kernel, there is just too much
> difference between them (2 vs 3 levels of page tables - LPAE is an
> entirely new format).
>
> If you mean some simpler macros like what we have for ARM/THUMB to
> reduce the number of lines, I'm fine with it though we don't always have
> a 1:1 mapping between LPAE and non-LPAE instructions.
>
> Alternatively, I'm happy to create a separate proc-v7lpae.S file.
That would probably be the best option.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists