[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305978842.3317.8.camel@odin>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:54:02 +0100
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yong Shen <yong.shen@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Fix off-by-one value range checking for
mc13xxx_regulator_get_voltage
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 20:56 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> We use val as array index,
> thus the valid value rangae for val should be 0 .. n_voltages-1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c b/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
> index 2bb5de1..bc27ab1 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>
> dev_dbg(rdev_get_dev(rdev), "%s id: %d val: %d\n", __func__, id, val);
>
> - BUG_ON(val > mc13xxx_regulators[id].desc.n_voltages);
> + BUG_ON(val >= mc13xxx_regulators[id].desc.n_voltages);
>
> return mc13xxx_regulators[id].voltages[val];
> }
Applied
Thanks
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists