lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DD7CC83.1020700@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Sat, 21 May 2011 20:00:27 +0530
From:	Mohan Pallaka <mpallaka@...eaurora.org>
To:	Mohan Pallaka <mpallaka@...eaurora.org>
CC:	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, rmk@...-67.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add stubs for pwm operations

  On 5/20/2011 10:29 AM, Mohan Pallaka wrote:
> Chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes
> would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't
> have support for pwm, even though the chip is programmed
> to work in non-pwm mode. Add stubs for pwm functions to
> avoid compilation errors in these scenarios.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Pallaka<mpallaka@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>   include/linux/pwm.h |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
> index 7c77575..54877f6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>
>   struct pwm_device;
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM)
>   /*
>    * pwm_request - request a PWM device
>    */
> @@ -28,4 +29,26 @@ int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
>    */
>   void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
>
> +#else
> +
> +struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm) { }
> +
> +int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm) { }
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_PWM */
>   #endif /* __LINUX_PWM_H */
> --
> Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
Hi Russell, please review this patch.

--Mohan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ