linux-kernel - Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201105211533.49082.luke@dashjr.org>
Date:	Sat, 21 May 2011 15:33:46 -0400
From:	"Luke-Jr" <luke@...hjr.org>
To:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, perex@...ex.cz,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?

On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
> The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate
> locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell
> Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB,
> I can quite confidently state they are separate bugs.

Unfortunately, I cannot help troubleshoot that bug any further, as I no longer 
have the affected motherboard. I was unable to reproduce it on my Intel 
DQ67SW.

However, I did encounter a new regression, which I have reported as:
	https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35552
This one is related to Intel HD Audio, not Graphics.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/