[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110521104310.GC26447@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:43:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/smep] x86, cpu: Enable/disable Supervisor Mode
Execution Protection
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> > +static __init void setup_smep(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > +{
> > + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SMEP)) {
> > + if (unlikely(disable_smep)) {
> > + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SMEP);
> > + clear_in_cr4(X86_CR4_SMEP);
> > + } else
> > + set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_SMEP);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> should be __cpuinit for this function.
>
> otherwise got:
>
> WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.cpuinit.text+0x1b10): Section mismatch in reference from the function identify_cpu() to the function .init.text:setup_smep()
> The function __cpuinit identify_cpu() references
> a function __init setup_smep().
> If setup_smep is only used by identify_cpu then
> annotate setup_smep with a matching annotation.
Yeah, indeed, and it might in fact crash with certain .config's. Mind sending a
tested patch?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists