[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110521105828.GA29442@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:58:28 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] timers: consider slack value in mod_timer()
There is an optimization which does not update the timer if the timer
was pending and the expiration time was unchanged.
Since commit 3bbb9ec9 ("timers: Introduce the concept of timer slack for
legacy timers") this optimization is no longer applied for timers where
the expiration time got extended due to the slack value. So here it adds
the check again after the expiration time might have been updated.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
---
kernel/timer.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index fd61986..bf09726 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -804,6 +804,8 @@ int mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires)
return 1;
expires = apply_slack(timer, expires);
+ if (timer_pending(timer) && timer->expires == expires)
+ return 1;
return __mod_timer(timer, expires, false, TIMER_NOT_PINNED);
}
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists