[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110522022126.GJ19987@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 03:21:26 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, npiggin@...nel.dk,
tim.c.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Add VFS event counter infrastructure
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 05:14:12PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> The recently discovered problem with RCU walks not working for absolute path
> motivated me to add some counters for these events to the VFS. Networking
> and VM has had such counters for a long time and they were always useful
> to diagnose performance problems. An advantage of counters over tracepoints
> is that they are always collected and are low enough overhead that
> they can be always enabled (unlike tracing)
>
> This patch implements a simple per CPU counter framework for the VFS.
> The counters are per CPU and are very little overhead. The counters
> are output in debugfs (/sys/kernel/fs/vfsstat)
WTF? Since when had debugfs become mandatory?
> + fs = debugfs_create_dir("fs", NULL);
> + if (fs)
> + debugfs_create_file("vfsstat", 0444, fs, NULL, &vfsstat_fops);
> + return 0;
Note that if that FPOS is configured away debugfs_create_dir() does _NOT_
return NULL - you get ERR_PTR(-ENODEV).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists