[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110523112815.GA4042@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:28:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Fix sample size bit operations
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> What we want is to count the number of bits in the mask,
> not some other random operation written in the middle
> of the night.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/event.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.c b/tools/perf/util/event.c
> index 17c1c3c..d3fa7e4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/event.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int perf_sample_size(u64 sample_type)
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
> - if ((mask << i) & 1)
> + if (mask & (1 << i))
> size++;
> }
I fixed this to be 1UL and applied your fixes out of email - perf top and perf
report works fine now, so this was a 64-bitness bug (you probably used a 32-bit
system for testing?).
Btw., shouldnt this use hweight() or such?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists