[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110523144159.5788ee9f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:41:59 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com>
Cc: alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gma500: Skip bogus LVDS VBT mode and check for LVDS
before adding backlight (try 2)
> Will it go into 2.6.40-rc1?
I hope so.
> The issue is that I'm not getting any EDID from the display. Could be
> the GMBus getting in the way or that the SDVO IO mapping isn't set up
> properly before sending the SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH command.
> I've been fiddling quite a lot with it but nothing seems to work, so
I'm also not clear if the i²c mapping is always the same. Certainly this
is a problem on Moorestown/Oaktrail in some cases.
> instead I took the current SDVO code (and large parts of the output
> handling) from the i915 driver and crammed it into gma500. That did
> the trick (though it's not currently talking to crtc abstraction
> properly).
Interesting.
> So my question is, do you think we should incorporate the new and more
> feature complete output handling from the i915 into gma500? We might
> even start sharing that code between gma500 and i915. If that is
> something you like to avoid we can of course keep working on our
> current output code.
Importing the code seems reasonable. KeithP didn't want it shared when I
asked him, but importing it and having the same code in many areas is the
first step to sharing anyway.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists