linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Clocksource: Move the Hyper-V clocksource driver out of staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110523184233.GA26835@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 23 May 2011 14:42:34 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	johnstul@...ibm.com, hch@...radead.org,
	Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Clocksource: Move the Hyper-V clocksource driver out
 of staging

> +#include <linux/version.h>

This one shouldn't be needed.

> +#include <asm/hyperv.h>
> +#include <asm/mshyperv.h>

not really a review for this driver, but what's the purpose if having
these two headers?

Shouldn't the Kconfig entry also move from drivers/staging to
arch/x86 towards the other clocksources?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/