[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110523230033.GA26471@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:00:33 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] STAGING pull for .40
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:43:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > Here is the big pull request for the staging tree for your .40 tree (or
> > 2.8.0, whatever you are wanting to rename it to.)
>
> Hmm. Doing my once-a-release "try to compile everything in staging
> after pulling from greg by using allyesconfig and also forcing all
> staging",
Ugh, I keep only testing 'allmodconfig' with all staging drivers, I'll
add this to my test build setup from now on.
> I get this:
>
> drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/built-in.o:(.data+0xba0):
> multiple definition of `wl_msg_level'
> drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmfmac/built-in.o:(.data+0x1a94): first
> defined here
>
> which looks like another case of "can't compile two things both into
> the kernel".
>
> Looks like the BRCMSMAC / BRCMFMAC drivers need to be mutually
> exclusive. Something like
>
> depends on m || (BRCMSMAC != y)
>
> for BRCMFMAC?
>
> Or they should just avoid using the same globally visible name.
Both probably. I'll fix this up for the next set of staging fixes after
you release -rc1.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists