linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 4/7] usb:gadget: Add SuperSpeed support to the Gadget Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110523061909.GE3095@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 May 2011 09:19:11 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>, greg@...ah.com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...com, ablay@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	'open list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/7] usb:gadget: Add SuperSpeed support to the Gadget
 Framework

Hi,

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:59:08PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >Well here is the dilemma: if I do it the other tree were done - I get
> >checkpatch error. 
> >You're right, adding this the way it's above doesn't look too good but when
> >I fixed the other three I was asked not to do so in this patch, which also
> >makes sense since it has nothing to do with SS support...
> >So what do I do? Submit with a checkpatch error?
> 
> It is nice to have things consistent and a follow-up patch could fix the
> checkpatch error(s).

I tend to like more when the cleanup comes beforehand ;-)

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)