[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110523071909.GD20715@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:19:09 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the i.MX tree with the tree
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:45:42AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the i.MX tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig between the "same"
> commits from the arm tree and the i.MX tree.
>
> Please don't rearrange commits when upstreaming them - or if you do, then
> update the source tree as well. I am assuming that the commits that are
> in the arm tree amount to the same as what has been int the i.MX tree for
> some time. There are a couple of extra commits in the i.MX tree, so I
> just used the i.MX version of those files. This may not work.
I have forgotten that my tree shows up in -next twice once rmk pulled
from me. I removed these patches from my -next queue and will hopefully
remember it next time aswell.
Thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists